Click here to join us on IRC (#charas on irc.freenode.net)!
Is this a joke or whatHalo 1: 2001Halo 2: 2004Halo 3: 2007Halo ODST: 2009Halo Reach: 2010And ODST was only really like, a mod of 3 which they released. And let's not mention Halo Wars. Ignoring ODST, it's been a brand new engine each time.
Ellie: I had a slice of ham in my hand. I was going to drop it, so I slapped it hard. It attached itself to the wall
But blizzard never fail!(Except with the latest patches and expansions for wow that actually maked me NOT want to play it)
Just to compare:Sonic 1: 1991Sonic 2: 1992Sonic CD: 1993Sonic 3: 1994Sonic and Knuckles: 1994Sonic 4: Who the hell cares, It's probably going to do terrible anyway.In short: There's no pattern or real recommendation about what or how you should space your sequels.
The Halo Reach gameplay videos all look stupid, like they totally ripped off Call of Duty. Although all of my friends who have played it say it's good, I have yet to play it and I don't think I will like it. I'm not a big Call of Duty fan in the first place, but I love me some Halo 3. Also Halo 2, but they took the online multi-player down =(Personally, I'm waiting for Metal Gear Solid: Rising. I love MGO but don't have a PS3 of my own. Rising will be released for 360 and I assume that with it's release will come MGO 3.0. Also, Raiden is a lot cooler than people think he is. Not as cool as Snake or Big Boss, but...
If you want an actual Metal Gear Solid game, you should be looking to Peace Walker. It's going to have the next MGO. And notice they removed the "Tactical Espionage Action" from Rising and replaced it with "Lightning Fast Action"? It might end up good, but it sure as hell won't be a real MGS game. It's also worth noting Peace Walker was originally called Metal Gear Solid 5: Peace Walker.