Why does every 1 prefer RM2k3 over XP?

[Trevlac]

Well to comment on what carmen said, XP is no more illegal than 2k3.  Especially since Enterbrain deliberately did not try to port it to America and thus, any English version of 2k3 is very illegal indeed.  Actually I had a site somewhere that compared the two programs in illegality.  So either Alex is mistaken with faulty information, or just believes the wrong thing.

I should say again, a certain image size with a certain sprite in a way doesn't make it an illegal GRAPHIC, not to mention posting scripts of a programming language called Ruby doesn't make a SCRIPT illegal, nor does anything besides posting links to RMXP download or sites that have a download.

Again, it's just as illegal as 2k3, something is either legal or illegal.  There's no getting around it.

[Genma2k]

hmmm... i dont like RMXP because:
I don't like the graphics(sp?) and I am to lazy to learn how to use it

[dragon11137]

Originally posted by Master Yoda
XP would be decent if it was 2003, but with better graphics. However, with the introduction of Ruby and things like taking out Paralax backrounds have ruined it. Also, I've tryed to get resources for XP to make it more futuristic and less olden times, but have failed. Charas doesn't support it for a reason and that's because we realise that newer doesnt always mean better

what is paralax BG? if it is panorama then rpg maker XP has it
Ruby is completley amazing and pretty simple to use
Xp has ALOT of oldentimes esources if you know where to look

[kodakumi]

i might have stopped using rpg makers.

but i would have to say xp was better then 2k3.


scripting makes making a game very open and simplistic.


though the default events couldve had a few more automated scripts.