Screw the facts, hes just gonna say whats convienient

[wildguy3922]

Originally posted by SnakeIzeGambit
Explain how using verbal harrasment would have been better.

Either way, Osmose was wrong for what he did and Charaman shouldn't have to put up with it.

And my analogy works anyways since rape doesn't always refer to sexual acts. Rape also refers to abusive treatment, physical or not.

That arguement is done and over with. Explaining it anymore would only drag it further.

[SnakeIzeGambit]

Actually it didn't take long to find.


1. The crime of forcing another person to submit to sex acts, especially sexual intercourse.

2. The act of seizing and carrying off by force; abduction.

3. Abusive or improper treatment; violation: a rape of justice



edit: and wildguy i actually started to type that when i read Kijuki's response, went to the bathroom and finished. So yes I was a little late, but who cares? I don't.

[Rune_of_Punishment]

Originally posted by SnakeIzeGambit
Explain how using verbal harrasment would have been better.

Either way, Osmose was wrong for what he did and Charaman shouldn't have to put up with it.

And my analogy works anyways since rape doesn't always refer to sexual acts. Rape also refers to abusive treatment, physical or not.

Incorrect. But I won't get into that. There are certain things that bringing light to is acceptable. But for Christ's sake, this is a miniscule problem over the INTERNET. Big whoop. If charaman did not care about Osmose's opinion, this topic would not be up.

[wildguy3922]

I suggest making a new topic about analogies instead.

[Kijuki_Magazaki]

Originally posted by SnakeIzeGambit
Actually it didn't take long to find.


1. The crime of forcing another person to submit to sex acts, especially sexual intercourse.

2. The act of seizing and carrying off by force; abduction.

3. Abusive or improper treatment; violation: a rape of justice

Ah ok, then your correct in that behalf, however the rape word on your anology was intended toward the sexual act. THOOOOO im not saing is wrong anymore, you have corrected me on that part of the thingy.

[wildguy3922]

Originally posted by wildguy3922
I suggest making a new topic about analogies instead.

Or not, who listens to me anyways.

[shinotebasiiackh]

Originally posted by wildguy3922

quote:

Originally posted by wildguy3922 I suggest making a new topic about analogies instead.

Or not, who listens to me anyways.

What?

[Kijuki_Magazaki]

Anyway i believe i am now allowed to lock the thread.

[SnakeIzeGambit]

I for one am happy that Charaman has brought this to light because Osmose has long been flaming others behind closed doors. I have a saved conversation myself that was shown to me. If it was between me and him I would have shown it too.

[shinotebasiiackh]

I would hope that anyone would have. He's been doing this **** for way too long now.

[kodakumi]

Wow, im sure you (charaman) and osmose are both in the bad.


arent these threads inapropriote for charas forums (promotion of argument).


ps: though it doesnt work when i do it... *locked*

[shinotebasiiackh]

Originally posted by kodakumi

arent these threads inapropriote for charas forums (promotion of argument).

Seince when has pointing out that a member is abusive been not OK?


Like flaming someone over a long period of time is?



Edit: Kijuki, I think we should keep this open long enough for Osmose to come in and try to explain himself.

[carmen]

Originally posted by kodakumi
Wow, im sure you (charaman) and osmose are both in the bad.


arent these threads inapropriote for charas forums (promotion of argument).


ps: though it doesnt work when i do it... *locked*

the most sense I've seen in this thread yet,....and you think we got enough google ads?

EDIT: I can keep it open too ^_-, I'm frontline def in this forum my man

[kodakumi]

Originally posted by carmen

quote:

Originally posted by kodakumi Wow, im sure you (charaman) and osmose are both in the bad. arent these threads inapropriote for charas forums (promotion of argument). ps: though it doesnt work when i do it... *locked*

the most sense I've seen in this thread yet,....and you think we got enough google ads?

EDIT: I can keep it open too ^_-, I'm frontline def in this forum my man

alrighty

[SaiKar]

CHARAMAN! What in the stars do you think you're doing? How DARE you attack Kijuki like that! He's doing the best he can with a mostly inactive moderation staff and a full list of real-life concerns to worry about. The last thing he needs is you storming in here and swearing at him about your self-centered concerns.

I am not going to ban Osmose. I don't care if Kujuki caved and said he will be banned. I don't care if you guys accuse me of sticking up for my friend. I'm just not going to do it. If you don't want to get harassed by someone: guess what. Stop opening private messages from them and replying. And take your ego elsewhere. No one cares if you make idle threats or not.

Alex wanted banning to be used as a last resort. A LAST RESORT! Only the most vile people that desire to bring Charas down are to be banned. Personal disagreements in private messages do not count! You, as a member of this board, have NO RIGHT to demand the banning of anyone else, PERIOD. Get off your ego trip. Everyone has people that dislike them. My guess is this post will get me a few people that dislike me. But it's necessary to set the standard here and now.

I'm going to go to bed, and I might check this tomorrow, or I might not. But in the meantime I uge you all to consider your positions. You are visitors on this forum that are allowed here by the grace of Alex the webmaster. You don't demand anything of your host. You follow his rules, and you follow the rules of his subbordonates, or you get the heck out.