New forum theme up and running!
Originally posted by MSlash67The people making that movie are very ignorant. It was something people dont like to remember. there will be alot of people pissed off about this movie.
Originally posted by Kinslayerquote:Originally posted by MSlash67The people making that movie are very ignorant. It was something people dont like to remember. there will be alot of people pissed off about this movie.I wouldn't call them ignorants, I'd call them "money making bastards"
Originally posted by Ace of Spades And if they have George Bush in it, then knowing Hollywood, they'll portray everything as being his fault.
Originally posted by Ace of Spades And the movie would pwn if it put MrMister's conspiracy theory in it.
Originally posted by DraceThere were WWII movies in the the early 1950's. ONLY 5 years after the war. It's around FIVE years after 9/11 now. If I have to pick what's worse, I'd rather say it's worse of WWII movies of the Jewish genicide in the 60s than a movie about 9/11 5 years later. Wounds wil never, they'll only be forgotten and wounds like 9/11 and WWII may not be forgotten.
I general I'd say I agree 98% with Grandy's post above.
Originally posted by AlmeidabooAbout first of: the massacre Grandy is talking about took place in Brazilīs hugest high-security prision, and was ordered by a general (or capitain) because the prisioners were making a big fat mess, destroying everything and killing each other. 111 prisioners were dead. I myself belive that pavilion 9 had no chance to be fixed. The people that were locked up there had no way back to society: they were the most dangerous people in the State, and were unhumanly cruel. Good thing they were all killed. A nice pack of **** to hell.
Originally posted by AlmeidabooAbout first of: the massacre Grandy is talking about took place in Brazilīs hugest high-security prision, and was ordered by a general (or capitain) because the prisioners were making a big fat mess, destroying everything and killing each other. 111 prisioners were dead. I myself belive that pavilion 9 had no chance to be fixed. The people that were locked up there had no way back to society: they were the most dangerous people in the State, and were unhumanly cruel. Good thing they were all killed. A nice pack of **** to hell.About second of: Ditto Grandy. Americans tend to be pussies when it comes to their little bruises.About third of: well, I made my own statement about if the movie's gonna suck or not.
Originally posted by charamanquote:Originally posted by AlmeidabooAbout first of: the massacre Grandy is talking about took place in Brazilīs hugest high-security prision, and was ordered by a general (or capitain) because the prisioners were making a big fat mess, destroying everything and killing each other. 111 prisioners were dead. I myself belive that pavilion 9 had no chance to be fixed. The people that were locked up there had no way back to society: they were the most dangerous people in the State, and were unhumanly cruel. Good thing they were all killed. A nice pack of **** to hell.I can't believe someone would say that. **** it. I'm done trying to comprehend any of this.Let me just say that the fact that you hold yourself in such a regard as to judge such a situation is really unnerving to me.I'm seeing a lot of insensitive comments in this thread about events, and theories (and opinions being presented as fact) that are making me ashamed to be a part of this discussion. You say you want to honor the dead but "oh only on my terms" or when it's convienient. Does any one here really believe the 9/11 conspiracies beng presented are at all sincerely representing the wishes of the dead? Please, people. reevaluate what you are saying before you try to critisize another person's insensitivity. People are people, whether they are ****** up or whatever, and it is not your job to pass judgement on the value of their lives, dead or alive.